I don't know what to say about putting this out so late. Other than to say, I did promise to, at least, get each blog out before the next episode airs, which means I've still technically got 36 days left to keep that promise. But the truth is, as you've noticed, I've had trouble getting these blogs out on time. Maybe I'm a little busy these days. Maybe it's because I'm a bit depressed lately. And, at least part of it is that, on some level, I've felt a little of what everyone else has felt about this season: The episodes are great, and I can't find a lot of faults with it, but something did seem a little off. It's probably the switch to such a more serious Doctor that makes the tone of the show a little less whimsical, and maybe I miss that. But that's not a fault with the show. But, maybe, it's why I had trouble getting these blogs out all season. I promise to get the Christmas one out quick. I mean, it's not like I'll have much to do.
So now, on with the show:
|I'm a Rocket Man! Burning up his fuse up here alone!|
Not too long ago, a friend of mine posted an article from The Onion AV Club called Fake deaths, cheap resurrections, and dealing with real grief. The author of the article very recently lost his fiancee to a freak blood clot traveling to her chest. The author goes on to talk about how Hollywood's treatment of death, since that incident, has bothered him. He criticized movies like Guardians of the Galaxy and Star Trek: Into Darkness for their treatment of deaths. He complains about death being used too often as a cheap motivator and, as a self described "death elitist," he feels this is insincere and insensitive. While I feel sorry for his loss, and know where he's coming from--and I really do know where he's coming from--he's wrong. I lost my mother when I was 23 to lung cancer. It was the most traumatic experience of my life. And I felt the way he felt for a while, but only about the really gratuitous movies, like Saw, that truly showed a disrespect for death. But when death is used as a motivator for noble deeds, and fuels a powerful clash between good and evil, I do not fault it at all. Death is the most powerful motivator in the human experience, and so colors so many parts of our lives, that I can understand the prominence of it in fiction. So to those who call "Dark Water" and "Death in Heaven" disrespectful to the dead, I say, as one of your fellow "death elitists," I understand your pain, but you're being a little oversensitive. This is a beautiful story, and it wouldn't be half as good if it wasn't so heartbreaking.
The Master is my favorite villain in Doctor Who. I was so excited to see the Master's return, and I was quite okay with her new appearance. While I've said before on this blog that I'm okay with the idea of a female Doctor, I've often wondered if, when it happens, it will still make it feel like the same person. Well, if there was any question, "Death in Heaven" answered it: a female regeneration can absolutely feel like the same character as the previous, male regeneration. Michelle Gomez plays a brilliant Master, with all the manic glee of John Simm's master, combined with the more condescending loftiness of the original Master, Roger Delgado. The only complaint I have about her performance is that I didn't get to see enough of it. John Simm's, after first being introduced in his own surprise reveal, got two full length episodes to show off his brilliant performance of the Master (even if the plot of those episodes was...flawed). I wish Michelle Gomez could have gotten as much time, because her performance was so wonderfully unhinged, I wanted to get to know her better.
My girlfriend pointed out, when I first showed her the series and we got to "Last of the Time Lords," the obvious Christ metaphors of the Doctor in that episode. The Doctor and the Master have a very obvious Jesus/Satan relationship, and this episode only further confirmed that. If the scene in the graveyard where Missy offers the Doctor her army isn't The Temptation of Christ, then my Catholic high school should take back my diploma. While it's not like that scene has never been done metaphorically in fiction before, this was one of the most compelling versions of it I've ever seen.
|Although I don't remember this passage in the Bible.|
"Every time the Doctor gets pally with someone, I have this overwhelming urge to notify their next of kin" - Rory Williams, in "The God Complex." And with that quote, we say goodbye to Osgood. I understand Moffat's explanation that Missy needed to kill someone we care about to remind us that she's still a stone cold psychopath and truly evil, but I also understand those who called it a Whedonesque gratuitous death. It was sad, but I think we're going to see her again. Remember that in "Day of the Doctor," Kate has met Clara, but Clara hasn't met Kate yet. I think we're going to pop in and see Kate and Osgood again, but earlier in their timeline.
Speaking of Kate, she is quickly becoming one of my favorite recurring characters. You see, Kate Stewart was first introduced in Downtime, a straight-to-video movie that was put out in 1995 when Doctor Who was off the air, and, to satiate the fans, and a company called Reeltime Pictures bought the rights to certain characters from Doctor Who but not the Doctor itself to create some spin-off movies. In Downtime, Kate is a very down on her luck single mother, estranged from her father, and is living on a houseboat. When Kate was introduced into proper canon (most extended universe materials in Doctor Who can be assumed to be canon, according to the BBC, but fans often only trust the TV show as certifiably canonical) in "Power of Three," I assumed they were rebooting the character. This version of Kate seemed like she was too attached to her father and had herself too much together to be the same Kate from Downtime. I was glad to see this episode seemed to confirm that this was the Kate from Downtime, or at least suggested it: "Kate Stewart, divorcee, mother of two, keen gardener, outstanding bridge player, also chief scientific officer Unified Intelligence Task Force..." Kate's been an awesome character, and more than playing stand-in for her father, she's become a very important part of Doctor Who, as the show finally has someone to represent Earth's official response to global emergencies.
Not that we've seen that many global emergencies in the Moffat era. One of the things I've always liked about Moffat is that, unlike Davies, he doesn't feel like every finale has to be about someone attacking the Earth. Davies defaulted on a big invasion of or attack on modern day Earth in every single season finale, as well as every Christmas special. With so many attacks in such little time, the Davies era's running joke became that Earth is invaded so often, people are starting to get paranoid. And rightfully so. How are there still people on Earth who don't believe in aliens? Why wouldn't everyone clear out of London every Christmas? Why doesn't every planet just have nukes pointed at the sky at all times? Moffat has been really creative in trying to find other ways to create really interesting climaxes in his season finales and Christmas specials that take place on other planets, in other times, or that involve very personal battles for the Doctor, rather than big Earth-wide emergencies. In fact, this is the first time in the Moffat era where either a season finale or a Christmas special has featured a Davies-like attack on modern Earth. Moffat, unlike Davies, understands how to use something sparingly, so he's allowed to do things like that.
And the Brigadier returns as a Cyberman! I actually watched this episode, for the first time, with my co-bloggers from the now defunct (and God do I miss it) 900 Year Diary, Kevin and Melissa. We don't often agree about things about Doctor Who (which is part of why we were so good on a blog together), and somehow all three of us loved this finale. But when the Cyber-Brigadier showed up, my first thought was "I feel like that was disrespectful." Melissa turned to me and said "Why? No, I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm honestly asking and I'm open to being convinced: why is that disrespectful?" I found myself unable to think of a real reason. Ultimately, it was a very strange, but very sweet tribute to the late, great Nicholas Courtney, who passed away 3 years ago. It's particularly Doctor Who-ish for the tribute to involve him saving the day, and saving his daughter. In death, the Brigadier is still a hero.
And the Doctor never salutes? Really?
|I think he's okay with it.|
The Doctor and Clara have one of the most dysfunctional relationships between any Doctor and companion in the show's history, second only to, possibly, the 6th Doctor and Peri.
|If you read my blog regularly, you'll remember this particular dead horse.|
But, as many have pointed out, Danny being dead, while a perfectly heartbreaking ending to the finale, leaves "Listen" completely unexplained. Orson Pink was not directly confirmed as one of Clara's descendants, but the implication had all the subtle innuendo of a dim-witted frat boy asking a sorority girl "Can I put my penis in you?" I don't think a lot was left to the imagination. And, had "Listen" and "Death in Heaven" aired in different seasons, I'd chalk it up to poor planning (like the truth field in "Time of the Doctor), but clearly Moffat knew where he was going with the show when he wrote "Listen." He has a plan for this, that's obvious. A lot of people have suggested that Clara is somehow already pregnant with Danny's baby (the family value brigade that complained about Vastra and Jenny kissing back in "Deep Breath" would have a field day with an unmarried companion becoming pregnant on a kids show). My co-host on the Mile High Who podcast, Somer, suggested that the Christmas special is going to involve Santa bringing Danny back to life somehow. I want the events of "Listen" to be resolved, but I do hope it's in a way that leaves that sad ending of Danny's death without cheaply bringing him back from the dead comic-book style.
And Santa's appearance was so much fun to see, especially played by, amazingly, Nick Frost. I wish Simon Pegg hadn't already appeared in Doctor Who, because he could have made a perfect elf next to his old friend and common co-star. And the scene we've seen from the Christmas special shows us that the Doctor is suspicious of Santa (Father Christmas to the Brits), thinking he's secretly the villain of the piece. Santa suggests that the Doctor is mistaken, and as much of this season has been about the Doctor actually being wrong, it's possible that Santa is telling the truth. The special seems to combine the reality of the North Pole (a place where a small handful of scientists occasionally set up a little shack to study things) with the fantasy version of it (Santa!). I'm looking forward to seeing where the special is going, despite most people's skepticism from the trailer and clip.
I'll probably post at least once or twice before Christmas. I'm looking forward to where the Christmas special is going. The Christmas specials, so far, have always featured one of the happy-go-lucky, life-is-wonderful type of Doctors (10 and 11) who can freely indulge in a child-like love of Christmas. This will be our first Christmas special with a more grumpy, crotchety type of Doctor. More Scrooge than Tiny Tim, I'll be interested to see how Moffat writes a Christmas special around a meaner Doctor. I'm looking forward to seeing what he comes up with!